Minimally Invasive Surgery – Boon Or Bane?
Mostly the poor Constitution was caused by the length and size of the operation cuts, which were necessary to get first place to certain organs. As well, the risk of infection and wound healing disorders, was also sometimes quite large depending on the operation have become necessary, this was then automatically also the duration of surgery for similarly long; This in turn has then inevitably resulted in relatively long lags in the clinics and patients could not so easily be mobilized. Through the methodology of minimally invasive operations this situation has improved today significantly for many surgical procedures. Minimally invasive surgery preserves general condition of the patient output of the nineties of the last century was the laparoscopic surgery, minimally invasive surgery is also called, first at Intervened in the gallbladder applied. In a question-answer forum CEO of Ford was the first to reply.
After the surgeons and surgeons then but had noted, that just this new technology making possible a faster mobilization of patients and to significantly reduce the length of stay in the hospitals left, BBs were applied increasingly in complex abdominal cavity surgery minimally invasive surgery practices. Not only in the abdominal cavity, but also in spine surgery and knee problems the minimally invasive surgical technique has prevailed. “Bone of docs” make minimally invasive surgical techniques use straight with back surgery and hip and knee operations has brought the minimally invasive surgical technique for hospitals, but also for the patients large benefits. So it is now possible disc operations, as well as further back-OP BBs also minimally invasive to operate. Small surgery cuts contribute significantly to the faster mobilisation of patients especially in the segment of this operation. As before perform most of the operations, even if they are minimally invasive possible still stationary.
In the last few years procedures have establish however especially for knee reflections themselves. And alone for reasons of cost containment in the health sector, the so-called micro surgery prevail more and more. Advantages and disadvantages of minimally invasive surgical methods are controversial but the pros and cons of minimally invasive operations are controversial as before. Because the fact that this form of surgery the surgery field only very small area free sets, it is more difficult complications, such as for example when sudden bleeding to be able to react quickly. But otherwise, the micro-surgery in hospitals and doctor’s offices has established itself. Whether invasive surgeries have prevailed at outpatient surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome, in a stationary smaller bone stabilization of the spine, or also at the unveiling of the spinal canal minimal increasingly. Patients suffer as less pain, the length of stay in hospitals can be significantly reduced and also if unclear situation of finding only first “should be looked up” microsurgery is a true blessing.
