You are currently browsing posts tagged with philosophy

The World

§ October 18th, 2019 § Filed under General § Tagged Comments Off on The World

E to run away from this sacrifice for Lester, means the expression of its physical compulsion and spiritual, a time that under the mentally ill work this is not possible. Lester opts then, to carry through a simple work as employee of one ' ' drive-trhu' ' it stops to enjoy of more free time for the leisure, for its personal life and who knows, the reconstitution of the affective bows with the family. The attitude of Lester opposes it the exacerbado desire of its Carolyn woman to have success as broker of property, to the ambition in reaching ' ' rankinng' ' of sales of its competitor, taking to forget it to it the affective life with the husband and its express son what the familiar disaggregation. For it, the success is tied the condition TO HAVE more money TO BE so important how much its competitor. ' ' With the valuation of the world of the things it increases in direct ratio the depreciation of the world of homens' ' (P. 159). The attainment of more money was above of the love and the affection that Lester and Jane needed, thus generating, a conturbado familiar triangle.

At the same time where the money is the way that joins all the social bonds, it also it is the way that separates. It half constitutes true of separation and the union, the force galvano-chemistry of the society. … divine force of the money, inhabits in its character as to be generic mentally ill and auto-alienator of the man. It is the mentally ill power of the humanity (MARX, op.cit P. 232-233). Lester passes to be detestado by Carolyn, rejected for its Jane son. The affective lack makes with that Lester is gotten passionate for the pretty ngela, friend of its son and becomes friend of the young son of the military man, that will become later, boyfriend of Jane.

Modernity

§ November 20th, 2012 § Filed under General § Tagged Comments Off on Modernity

Modernity, the Man and the Anguish Emerson Martins Garci’a Words key: anguish, existencialismo, history, man, individual, century XX. Summary: This article, in the search to identify the reasons of the anguish feeling, sucintamente covers the line of history from the end of the Average Age, looking for to point out the Man in the registered contexts and the possible difficulties found for it to dedicate the proper knowledge to it of itself. From Sren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813? 1855) and of the existencialismo, are in century XX that the Man if identifies individual, and, therefore, soon if to come across with its freedom and consequentemente with the anguish. I? Introduction This work searchs to show the reason of the sprouting of the feeling of anguish in the Man, as defined and perceived in century XX, in a existencialista boarding. The adopted method consisted of contextualizar the Man in history and diverse cultural shocks for it suffered, taking it gradual if to discover as individual, therefore, one ' ' to be aberto' ' , placed ahead of the freedom of the choice imprisons that it, as we will see in Giles. Being overcome it line of history, leaving of the end of the Average Age until the century XX and the beginning of this, inexorable is, quantitatively and qualitatively, the number of occured transformations in the humanity, for it, and for it. Between the consequences and inheritances of these deep mutations, unstable and always not lasting, the Man did not find space to be able to identify and to live its feelings and emotions, being to the edge of its individuality. The anguish, this close feeling of oppression, continuous intranqilidade, tension front to the world, vertigo ahead of the blackness of the choice and that, at the same time it grows to if coming across with more freedom, only finds space to disclose themselves and to be identified as such in century XX, after authors and philosophers, mainly Kierkegaard, to desnudarem the existencial question of the Man.

Psychology Of Gender: The Role Of Men And Women

§ May 6th, 2011 § Filed under General § Tagged , , , Comments Off on Psychology Of Gender: The Role Of Men And Women

The study of psychology, men and women, their difference from each other, has direct relevance not only to themselves, but to society as a whole. Issues related to the particular sex and psychological differences, recent often the most discussed issues in society. The main reason for this is that the role of men and women varies significantly with time. Social psychology of gender – is a huge industry for the study of prejudice, discrimination, social perception, self-reflection, self-esteem, and the concept of social norms and roles. In psychology, the concept of gender – it's just a biological characteristic with which people determine the male and female. Social psychologists believe that the main reasons are the traditional definition of gender and information pressure. The traditional pressure "explains the mechanism in which a person forced to conform to society's expectations, so it was not rejected. Punishment for disobeying sexually roles can be very cruel.

The ruler of Iran, Ayatollah , from 1979 to mid-80s, overturned a law that gave the woman any rights, and sentenced to death more than 20,000 women who did not obey the rules of conduct and dress codes. Fundamentals of social differences can be seen even before birth. For example, the desire of parents and others to know who will be born, boy or girl. Much envy of how the child would be called, what clothes and toys will buy until the child grows. By three years the child is already safe to identify themselves to a male or female gender.