You are currently browsing the archives for April, 2014
§ April 19th, 2014 § Filed under General § Tagged today Comments Off on Psychoanalysis
Two speeches are found, and each one reveals to the other as a place in which every utterance can be restated radically, in which no evidence have certainty be evident for the other. Psychosis questions the common heritage of certainty and the causal logic on which our culture is founded. Psychoanalysis is a praxis. This means that in the field of Freudian experience there is no place for a theoretical knowledge of a psychic phenomenon, without this knowledge makes it possible (I’m not saying that you would ensure) an action on the phenomenon. The paradox lies in that, on the one hand, I have a theoretical model that allows us to understand the speech psychotic and, on the other, this understanding is in general (or in most cases) ineffective. Psychoses question what we mean by psychoanalysis, analytical device and place of the analyst. I’ll then enunciate the hypothesis that I intend to hold in this work: there is no Psychoanalysis of the psychotic but the psychotic can benefit from psychoanalysis, used their analyst to obtain something that (in certain circumstances), and only among all mental health specialists, is able to offer you, precisely as psychoanalyst. You authorize us to speak of an adventure (of the psychotic) that, unlike the neurosis, we have not lived subjectively?.
This makes obstacle in healing. We cannot understand anything of psychosis, because our mental scheme of neurotic is organized according to our neurotic, phantom ghost who is founded in castration, which is what in the psychotic there. We can live with our paranoia, our schizia, that which we call our melancholy, with all those horrors that we are passionate about and ill, with our madness in sum; without which we would not be who we are. Lacan says: And being of man not only he cannot comprehend what is without insanity, but that it would not even be the being of man, but take itself madness how limit their freedom (about psychic causality) all arder.
§ April 14th, 2014 § Filed under General § Tagged education Comments Off on Extra Education School
While secondary education was destined to the children of the elite, the professionalizing one was reserved for the low classrooms, with daily pay-vocational education the classrooms less favored. However industrial education emphasized the studies technician with the objective to take care of to the interests of the worker, propitiating to it professional preparation and the formation human being (BETTI, 1991). According to Betti, (1991, p.123): Decree 6,141, of 28 of December of 1943, established the bases of the organization of commercial education, giving the purposes to it to form professionals for the commerce, the public affairses and private, as well as promoting its I continue perfectioning. After the end of the New State the Physical Education suffers low one, the Minister of the Education and Health of the government Jose Linhares, adopted measured that it affected this directly disciplines, diminishing of three for two weekly sessions in secondary education, also reducing the duration of each session, beyond leaving isolated the divisions of Physical Education and Extra Education School (BETTI, 1991). With the redemocratizao in the country the popular movements had gained force, the parties politicians tried to place in practical its ideologies. The elaboration appears then of the first LDB, that in the period called LDBEN (Law of Lines of direction and Bases in the National Education) causing thirteen years of debates and disputes around its definition, until being promulgated in 20 of December of 1961 (ZOTTI, 2004). According to Zotti (2004, p.98): The adopted educational politics in this period, according to plain of JK, sped up the education to the necessities of the development, meaning a supervaluation of professionalizing education, not only in average education, but until the elementary school it would have of if compelling? to educate for the work? , atrelando the paper of the school the necessities of the work market. The education system continued so elitist and antidemocratic how much it had been previously..
It can have several dimensions: individual, that is to say a degree from integration to its surroundings from the nearest relations of a person, family or company; a sectorial dimension, that is to say the action of people or organizations in its extended surroundings, its interrelation and its relation with the powers public (enterprise property to communitarian networks, unions, associations, etc.). Finally, it is the collective or national dimension, that is to say the share capital understood like a heap of a society as a whole. In that sense, concept of Share capital groups confidence slight knowledge, associates-tividad, brings back to consciousness civic and predominant ethical values that, altogether, facilitate or make difficult the Development of a certain society. The great advantage of this concept is that it makes recognize that the social relations of solidarity, cooperation and confidence are producing of a wealth and sustainable social benefit (because related with the same social weave) that could not be obtained from the mere market. It allows to criticize the absurd thing that constitutes, from a strict economic point of view, the fact to destroy social and cultural relations replacing them by mere economic relations, when stimulating the mercantilizacin of all the dimensions of the human life. From the point of view of the university disciplines, the Share capital is the theoretical bridge between a merely economic approach and a social and cultural approach of the Development of the society. In synthesis, the more share capital, the more economic growth in the long term, minor criminality, the more public health, the more democratic governability. The notion does not try to supplant to the weight in the development of the macroeconomic factors, but it draws attention envelope that must add to them these dimensions. The mere economicista reduccionismo is a close vision and takes to inefficient policies. When we speak of Development, we emphasize Sustainable Human Development: It is a key term that must carefully be defined for the RSU.
